SAAS CI CD
- Anand Nerurkar
- Apr 27
- 5 min read
Updated: Apr 29
how does ci cd piple line work for multi tenant saas platform
In a multi-tenant SaaS platform, the CI/CD pipeline needs to be thoughtfully architected to support tenant-specific configurations, data isolation, scalability, and safe deployments.
Here's a structured breakdown of how CI/CD typically works in this scenario:
🚀 CI/CD Pipeline for Multi-Tenant SaaS Platform
🔧 1. Code Repository Setup (e.g., GitHub)
Single codebase with tenant-specific logic handled via configurations or feature flags.
Branching strategy:
main/develop for core features.
Tenant-specific feature branches if needed.
🔄 2. CI Stage (Build & Test)
Goals: Validate that the application works across all tenants.
Unit Tests: Generic and tenant-specific logic.
Multi-Tenant Test Matrix: Run integration tests for representative tenant configurations.
Static Code Analysis: SonarQube, Checkmarx, etc.
Security Scanning: Snyk, Trivy for container and dependency scanning.
Tools: GitHub Actions / Jenkins / GitLab CI
🧪 3. Artifact Packaging
Build Docker images tagged by version and tenant-specific identifiers if needed.
Push to container registry (e.g., ECR, ACR, GCR).
Generate tenant-specific environment artifacts (e.g., values-tenant1.yaml for Helm).
🚀 4. CD Stage (Deployments)
There are two primary patterns for deploying in a multi-tenant SaaS:
📦 a. Single Deployment Model (Shared Everything / Shared App)
Same app instance runs for multiple tenants.
Deployment is done once.
Tenant routing handled via config, headers, subdomains.
✅ Pros: Cost-efficient, easier to manage⚠️ Challenges: High complexity for config management, risk of tenant noise
🧱 b. Isolated Deployment Model (Per-Tenant Deployments)
Separate Kubernetes namespaces / containers / instances per tenant.
Deployment pipeline loops through tenants:
yaml
for tenant in tenant_list: deploy --values=values-${tenant}.yaml
✅ Pros: High isolation, better for premium/regulated tenants⚠️ Challenges: Operational overhead, cost
🔄 5. Tenant-Aware Configuration Management
Use config-as-code:
Tenant-specific values in Git (config/tenant1/, config/tenant2/)
Store in Secrets Manager / SSM / Vault.
Feature flag services like LaunchDarkly or Unleash for rollout.
🧪 6. Environment Promotion Strategy
Dev → QA → Staging → Production
Canary deployments with tenant-specific traffic monitoring.
Blue/Green or Rolling update strategies.
Tenant-specific smoke tests post-deploy.
📊 7. Observability & Rollback
Dashboards and logs segmented by tenant.
Distributed tracing (e.g., OpenTelemetry) includes tenant context.
Rollback automation: Revert only impacted tenant if isolated.
🔐 8. Governance, Audit & Compliance
CI/CD audit trails: who deployed what for which tenant.
Fine-grained access control (e.g., least privilege for tenant pipelines).
Integrate with compliance checks (e.g., SOC2, ISO).
📌 Sample Tech Stack
Stage | Tools |
CI | GitHub Actions, Jenkins, SonarQube |
CD | ArgoCD, Spinnaker, Helm, Terraform |
Observability | Prometheus, Grafana, ELK, Jaeger |
Secrets Mgmt | Vault, AWS SSM, Azure Key Vault |
🧪🎬 Demo Walkthrough: Single-Tenant Deployment (ICICI Bank)
🔹 Step 1: Trigger Build
Developer commits new features specific to ICICI Bank (e.g., customized onboarding flow) to the develop branch or tenant/icici branch.
GitHub Actions/Jenkins triggers the pipeline.
🔹 Step 2: CI Pipeline Execution
Unit Tests run against a configuration matrix, picking ICICI-specific values from the config/icici/ directory.
Static & Security Scanning (SonarQube, Trivy) ensures code quality and compliance.
🔹 Step 3: Artifact Build
Docker image is created and tagged:
makefile
ukg-banking-onboarding:1.3.0-icici
Helm values specific to ICICI are generated:
bash
helm/icici/values.yaml
🔹 Step 4: CD Pipeline - ICICI Namespace
Namespace-based isolation in AKS:
lua
kubectl create ns icici-bank
ArgoCD deploys services to icici-bank namespace using ICICI-specific Helm values.
Secrets are injected from Vault (e.g., vault/icici/db-creds, vault/icici/api-keys).
🔹 Step 5: Post-Deploy Validations
Automated smoke tests validate login, account summary, and onboarding APIs for ICICI.
Custom validation hook ensures:
UPI integration
ICICI's theme/branding
RBI reporting endpoints
🔹 Step 6: Monitoring & Feedback Loop
Logs and metrics are tenant-tagged (e.g., tenant=icici in Prometheus/Grafana).
Alerts and dashboards scoped to ICICI team.
Canary checks validate rollback readiness.
🔹 Step 7: Tenant-Specific Rollout
Canary deployment (10% → 50% → 100%) if enabled.
Feature flags (e.g., LaunchDarkly) allow toggling specific flows for ICICI only.
🔐 Governance Snapshot
Deployment audit trail with tenant-specific scope.
RBAC ensures only ICICI-deployment team has access.
Vault policies enforce isolation on secrets.
✅ Result: ICICI Bank receives a zero-downtime, secure, tenant-specific update with full visibility and rollback safety.
Personal Banking Saas Case Study
📊 Case Study: Multi-Tenant SaaS Platform for Personal Banking
🏦 Use Case Overview
A cloud-native, multi-tenant SaaS platform for personal banking serving tenants like ICICI and HDFC Bank. Supports services such as:
Digital onboarding
Loan origination
Wealth and mutual fund management
Fraud detection
Customer support (chatbot/agent)
🎯 Business Objectives
Deliver cost-effective shared infrastructure with secure tenant isolation
Scale with tenant growth while maintaining performance
Meet compliance, privacy, and audit requirements (e.g., RBI, SEBI)
🧱 Architecture Highlights
Frontend: React micro-frontends with tenant-aware routing
Backend: Spring Boot microservices
Database: Postgres + MongoDB, tenant-isolated
Messaging: Kafka + NATS
AI/ML: Fraud detection, recommendation engine
API Gateway: Azure API Management with OAuth2, rate limiting
Hosting: Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
🔁 Multi-Tenant CI/CD Pipeline
🔧 1. Code Repository
Single codebase with feature flags or config per tenant
Branching: main, develop, and optional tenant-specific branches
🔄 2. CI Stage
Run tests with tenant config matrix
Static & security analysis (SonarQube, Trivy)
📦 3. Artifact Packaging
Docker images tagged with versions and tenant IDs
Helm chart values per tenant
🚀 4. CD Stage
Shared Deployment Model:
Deploy once with tenant-aware routing and config
Isolated Deployment Model:
Deploy per tenant to separate K8s namespaces
🔄 5. Config Management
GitOps with tenant config stored in separate directories
Use AWS SSM / Vault for secrets
Feature flags (LaunchDarkly/Unleash)
🧪 6. Promotion Strategy
Dev → QA → UAT → Prod
Canary, blue/green or rolling updates
Tenant-specific post-deploy validations
📊 7. Observability & Rollbacks
Tenant-tagged logs, metrics, traces
Auto rollback with impact scope analysis
🔐 8. Governance
CI/CD audit logs
Access control per tenant or deployment scope
Tools: GitHub Actions, Jenkins, ArgoCD, Helm, Prometheus, Grafana, Vault
🧪🎬 Demo Walkthrough: Single-Tenant Deployment (ICICI Bank)
🔹 Step 1: Trigger Build
Developer commits new features specific to ICICI Bank to the develop branch or tenant/icici branch.
GitHub Actions/Jenkins triggers the pipeline.
🔹 Step 2: CI Pipeline Execution
Unit Tests run against ICICI-specific config from config/icici/.
Static & Security Scanning ensures compliance.
🔹 Step 3: Artifact Build
Docker image: ukg-banking-onboarding:1.3.0-icici
Helm values from helm/icici/values.yaml
🔹 Step 4: CD Pipeline - ICICI Namespace
Namespace created: kubectl create ns icici-bank
ArgoCD deploys to icici-bank namespace
Vault injects secrets like vault/icici/db-creds
🔹 Step 5: Post-Deploy Validations
Smoke tests validate ICICI login, onboarding APIs
Hooks check UPI, branding, RBI endpoints
🔹 Step 6: Monitoring & Feedback Loop
Logs and metrics tagged tenant=icici
ICICI-specific dashboards and alerts
🔹 Step 7: Tenant-Specific Rollout
Canary rollout with feature flags enabled per ICICI
🔐 Governance Snapshot
Tenant-scoped deployment logs
RBAC limits to ICICI team
Vault policies enforce isolation
✅ Result: Secure, zero-downtime, tenant-specific update for ICICI Bank
📈 Benefits Delivered
40% reduction in ops overhead via GitOps automation
Zero downtime deployment with tenant impact shielding
Tenant-specific rollout control enabling faster adoption

Comments