Microservices Architect Interview
- Anand Nerurkar
- Sep 5
- 3 min read
🏗 1. Microservices Architect Interview Coverage
A strong preparation plan should cover:
Foundations & Principles
Microservices characteristics (loose coupling, bounded context, independent deployability)
12/15-Factor App methodology
API-first design & contract-driven development
Event-driven architecture basics
Architecture & Design
Decomposition strategies (DDD, business capability mapping, strangler pattern)
Sync vs async communication (REST, gRPC, Kafka/EventHub, NATS)
Data management (polyglot persistence, distributed transactions, CQRS, Saga pattern)
Resiliency patterns (circuit breaker, bulkhead, retry/backoff, idempotency)
Cloud & Infra
Containerization (Docker), Orchestration (Kubernetes/AKS/EKS/GKE)
Service mesh (Istio/Linkerd)
API Gateway & security (OAuth2, OIDC, JWT, mTLS)
CI/CD pipelines, DevSecOps, GitOps
Observability & Ops
Distributed tracing (OpenTelemetry, Jaeger)
Logging (ELK, Loki)
Metrics (Prometheus, Grafana)
Chaos engineering & blue/green/canary deployments
Non-functional Requirements
Scalability (horizontal scaling, autoscaling policies)
Security (zero trust, shift-left, secret management)
Compliance (GDPR, PCI DSS, SOX)
Cost optimization (FinOps practices)
🎯 2. Common Interview Questions & Model Answers
A. Microservices Fundamentals
Q: What are the key principles of microservices architecture?A:
Business capability alignment – Each service owns a business domain (DDD bounded context).
Loose coupling & high cohesion – Services interact via well-defined contracts.
Independent deployment – Each service can be deployed without impacting others.
Decentralized data – Each service owns its data, enabling polyglot persistence.
Automation – CI/CD pipelines, infra-as-code, automated testing.
Observability – Monitoring, logging, tracing built-in.
B. Service Decomposition
Q: How do you decide service boundaries?A:
Use Domain-Driven Design (DDD): identify bounded contexts and core domains.
Map business capabilities to microservices.
Analyze team structure (Conway’s Law) to avoid high cross-team dependencies.
Use event-storming workshops with SMEs to discover workflows and data ownership.
Avoid nano-services — each service should deliver meaningful business value.
C. Data & Transaction Management
Q: How do you handle transactions across multiple microservices?A:
Avoid distributed 2PC (too slow, brittle).
Use Saga pattern:
Choreography (events) for simple flows.
Orchestration (central coordinator) for complex flows.
Ensure idempotency for event handlers.
Use compensating transactions for rollbacks.
D. Communication Patterns
Q: When to use sync vs async communication?A:
Sync (REST/gRPC): low-latency requests, user-driven flows (e.g. fetch user profile).
Async (Kafka/EventHub/NATS): decoupled flows, eventual consistency, high throughput (e.g. payment events, fraud alerts).
Use API Gateway for sync and event streaming platform for async.
E. Resiliency
Q: How do you design resilient microservices?A:
Circuit breaker (e.g. Resilience4j) to avoid cascading failures.
Retry with exponential backoff & jitter.
Bulkhead isolation & timeout configuration.
Graceful degradation (return cached/default data if dependency fails).
Chaos testing to validate resilience.
F. Security
Q: How do you secure microservices?A:
Use OAuth2 + OIDC for user authentication, JWT for service-to-service auth.
Apply mTLS for internal traffic.
Implement zero trust (no implicit trust between services).
Use API Gateway + WAF + rate limiting.
Secrets in Vault/Key Vault/Secrets Manager, not hardcoded.
G. Observability
Q: How do you make microservices observable?A:
Correlate logs with trace IDs.
Use distributed tracing (OpenTelemetry + Jaeger/Zipkin).
Emit key metrics (latency, error rate, throughput).
Define SLOs/SLIs/SLA and monitor with Prometheus + Grafana dashboards.
🛠 3. Scenario-Based Questions
Scenario: Existing monolith is too slow to release. How will you modernize?
Apply strangler fig pattern to incrementally extract microservices.
Prioritize business-critical capabilities first (risk-based approach).
Build CI/CD, containerize services, use feature toggles.
Scenario: Payment service is causing latency and affecting checkout.
Introduce async processing for non-critical operations.
Apply circuit breaker to prevent total outage.
Add caching for frequently accessed data (e.g. user preferences).
Scenario: Services are talking too much to each other, causing chatty APIs.
Revisit service boundaries – merge if too granular.
Use API composition or BFF (Backend for Frontend) pattern.
Introduce CQRS + materialized view to reduce cross-service calls.
📊 4. Sample Architecture to Explain in Interview
Here’s a text version you can confidently describe:
[API Gateway] --> [Auth Service] --> [Microservices on AKS/EKS]
|--> [Order Service] --> publishes OrderCreatedEvent --> [Kafka]
|--> consumed by [Inventory Service], [Billing Service], [Shipping Service]
|--> [Customer Service] --> owns Customer DB
|--> [Notification Service] --> async email/SMS
[Service Mesh] for mTLS, traffic shaping, observability
[CI/CD Pipeline] for automated builds, tests, deployments
[Prometheus + Grafana] for metrics, [ELK] for logs, [Jaeger] for tracing
You can draw this quickly on a whiteboard if asked.
🧠 5. Key Tips to Ace the Interview
Use real-world examples – relate answers to BFSI (lending, payments, KYC).
Mention trade-offs – e.g., eventual consistency vs strong consistency.
Show leadership thinking – team alignment, governance, DevSecOps.
Think about NFRs early – security, performance, observability.
Communicate in layers – business view → logical view → technical view.
.png)

Comments