Gen AI Agent in EA
- Anand Nerurkar
- Oct 26
- 14 min read
🧭 1. Strategic Intent — Why GenAI / Agentic AI in EA
“As part of our enterprise architecture modernization strategy, I positioned GenAI and Agentic AI as strategic enablers to improve decision-making, developer productivity, and customer experience across business and technology layers.”
Objectives:
Accelerate architecture governance, documentation, and impact analysis using GenAI copilots.
Drive business capability augmentation using AI agents — e.g., KYC, loan underwriting, compliance checks.
Enhance operational efficiency with AI-assisted SDLC, testing, and DevOps automation.
Enable data democratization and insight generation with GenAI-powered self-service analytics.
🏗️ 2. Integration of GenAI into Enterprise Architecture Strategy
EA Layer | How GenAI / Agentic AI was leveraged | Tools / Frameworks | Example in BFSI |
Business Architecture | Used GenAI for capability modeling & process optimization suggestions. | OpenAI GPT / Azure OpenAI + BIZBOK | Capability-based transformation: automated identification of redundant processes using GenAI. |
Information Architecture | Used GenAI for metadata discovery, semantic mapping, and data lineage generation. | Azure Purview + GenAI pipeline | Automated mapping of data entities across 40+ systems for faster data cataloging. |
Application Architecture | Introduced Agentic AI-driven “Application Rationalization Copilot” to suggest retire/retain/rehost recommendations. | LangChain, RAG, Knowledge Graph | Reduced rationalization time from 6 months → 3 weeks. |
Technology Architecture | GenAI-driven recommendations for best-fit tech stack, compliance rules, and cloud blueprints. | Azure OpenAI + Terraform GPT Plugin | Auto-generated cloud landing zone templates with embedded policy-as-code. |
Governance & Compliance | AI Copilot embedded in EA repository to summarize architecture review decisions and identify non-compliant designs. | GPT-4, LangChain, Confluence API | EARB summary generation and risk flagging automated. |
🧠 3. Agentic AI in EA Operating Model
You can say:
“We moved from static AI models to Agentic AI— autonomous agents working collaboratively across EA domains.”
Examples:
Agent | Function | Outcome |
EA Copilot Agent | Ingests EA artifacts, standards, and roadmaps. Assists architects in generating architecture views and compliance summaries. | Cut architecture documentation time by 50%. |
Governance Agent | Monitors project Jira tickets, flags architectural deviations automatically, prepares review board reports. | Improved compliance visibility. |
Tech Radar Agent | Continuously scans open-source and cloud service updates, evaluates them against standards. | Dynamic technology radar. |
Risk & Compliance Agent | Correlates audit logs, identifies architecture-level risks or breaches. | Automated early warning for non-compliance. |
Framework Used:
Multi-Agent Frameworks (LangChain, CrewAI)
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for contextual AI
Azure OpenAI + Enterprise Graph DB for knowledge orchestration
Integrated with EA tools (LeanIX, Confluence, Jira)
🧩 4. Architecture Governance Transformation with GenAI
You can explain how you used AI to augment EA governance:
Governance Function | AI Enablement | Benefit |
EA Repository Maintenance | GenAI auto-generates ArchiMate diagrams & summary docs from project artifacts. | 60% faster documentation. |
Architecture Review (EARB) | AI agent summarizes architecture submissions, flags deviations, and recommends reusable patterns. | Reduced review cycle from 2 weeks → 3 days. |
Technology Evaluation | AI recommends tech choices aligned with enterprise standards using policy-based reasoning. | Faster decision-making. |
Knowledge Management | Conversational AI trained on architecture decisions and patterns for on-demand learning. | Continuous architect enablement. |
🧱 5. Technical Stack and Tools Used
Category | Tool / Platform | Purpose |
Foundation LLM | Azure OpenAI (GPT-4 Turbo) | Natural language reasoning |
RAG / Context Layer | LangChain + Azure Cognitive Search | Context retrieval from EA docs |
Agent Framework | CrewAI / AutoGen / Semantic Kernel | Multi-agent orchestration |
Data Storage | Neo4j / Cosmos DB | Enterprise Knowledge Graph |
Integration | REST APIs to LeanIX, Jira, Confluence | Pull/push EA data |
Visualization | Power BI / Miro AI | EA dashboards, AI insights |
⚙️ 6. Implementation Approach (Step-by-Step)
Step | Action | Stakeholders | Output |
1 | Identify EA pain points that can be automated with AI (e.g., documentation, reviews). | EA Office, CTO, PMO | EA Copilot Opportunity Matrix |
2 | Build pilot using Azure OpenAI + LangChain | EA Team, AI COE | POC validated by EARB |
3 | Define governance and compliance boundaries for AI agents (ethical AI, explainability). | Risk, Compliance, CISO | AI Governance Policy |
4 | Integrate EA Copilot into EA workflows | Tech Council, Cloud COE | AI-assisted EA Governance |
5 | Track KPIs (cycle time, compliance rate, reuse index) | CTO Office | KPI Dashboard via Power BI |
📊 7. KPIs and Measurable Benefits
KPI | Baseline | After GenAI / Agentic AI |
Architecture documentation cycle | 3 weeks | 1 week |
EA review cycle | 10 days | 3 days |
Reuse of patterns | 40% | 70% |
EA compliance deviation rate | 18% | 6% |
Time to generate architecture summary | 2 hours | 5 minutes |
🎯 8. Strategic Outcome
“By embedding GenAI and Agentic AI into our EA governance, we transformed Enterprise Architecture from a compliance-driven function into a cognitive, insight-driven capability that accelerates transformation, ensures consistency, and enables informed CXO-level decisions.”
Below is a realistic, banking-context mapping of each AI Agent, what it did, and which tools / frameworks / models you used — all enterprise-grade, safe to mention in interviews.
🧠 GenAI / Agentic AI Tool Mapping — by Agent Function
# | AI Agent Name | Purpose / Function | GenAI / Agentic Tools & Frameworks Used | Example Output / Value |
1 | 🧩 EA Copilot Agent | Assists enterprise architects in generating architecture views, principles, and summaries from existing documents (Confluence, Jira, PDFs). | - Azure OpenAI GPT-4 Turbo (core LLM) - LangChain (for retrieval orchestration) - Azure Cognitive Search (for RAG context from EA repository) - Power Automate / MS Graph API (integration with Confluence & Jira) - ArchiMate Model Generator Plugin | Generated architecture blueprints and summary decks automatically from project docs — reduced documentation time by 50%. |
2 | 🧭 Governance Agent | Monitors project Jira tickets, flags non-compliant designs, drafts EARB/SARB meeting summaries. | - LangChain Agents + GPT-4 (policy enforcement logic) - Python Automation with Jira REST API - Azure Logic Apps (workflow orchestration) - Power BI + Copilot for Data for dashboard generation | Auto-flagged architecture deviations, generated compliance reports weekly — improved governance visibility. |
3 | ⚙️ Technology Radar Agent | Continuously scans new technologies, frameworks, and cloud services; evaluates alignment with enterprise standards. | - OpenAI GPT-4 Turbo with Custom RAG Index on TechRadar & GitHub data - Azure Cognitive Search for trend data - LangChain Agents for categorization (Adopt / Trial / Assess / Hold) - Power BI Copilot for visualization | Produced dynamic “Tech Radar” updated weekly — accelerated tech evaluation process by 40%. |
4 | 🧮 Application Rationalization Agent | Analyzes app inventory (from CMDB or LeanIX), maps to capabilities, and recommends “Retire / Rehost / Replatform”. | - GPT-4 fine-tuned with enterprise app metadata - Neo4j Knowledge Graph to model app-capability relationships - LangChain + Pandas Agent for reasoning over structured data - Azure Functions for integration | Generated rationalization recommendations — reduced manual assessment effort by 70%. |
5 | 🧑💼 Risk & Compliance Agent | Reads architecture review logs, cloud policies, and audit data to detect violations or security gaps. | - Azure OpenAI GPT-4 + LangChain for text reasoning - Azure Sentinel + Logic Apps for event data feeds - RAG Index on Policy Documents (ISO 27001, RBI, PCI DSS) - Power BI Copilot for risk dashboards | Auto-identified 20+ architecture non-compliance patterns, triggered alerts before audit cycles. |
6 | 💡 Knowledge Management Agent | Acts as conversational assistant for architects; answers queries from EA standards, patterns, and roadmaps. | - Azure OpenAI GPT-4 (core LLM) - RAG with Confluence + SharePoint Knowledge Base - LangChain Memory + Vector DB (Pinecone or Azure Cosmos DB) - MS Teams Copilot Integration | “Ask the EA” chatbot – improved knowledge accessibility across architects and developers. |
7 | ☁️ Cloud Blueprint Agent | Auto-generates IaC templates and cloud architecture blueprints based on EA standards and security baselines. | - GPT-4 + LangChain Code Interpreter - Terraform / Bicep Plugin via OpenAI Function Calling - Azure Policy as Code Library (CAF) - GitHub Copilot / Copilot Enterprise | Generated standardized AKS + API Gateway + Kafka blueprint with embedded security guardrails. |
8 | 🧰 DevOps & SDLC Agent | Suggests pipeline templates, test cases, and CI/CD optimization using GenAI. | - GitHub Copilot / GitLab Duo - Azure DevOps Copilot - LangChain Code Agent for test case generation | Reduced manual DevOps setup time by 30–40% and improved CI/CD standardization. |
🧩 Underlying Architecture (for reference if asked)
Core LLM Platform: Azure OpenAI GPT-4 Turbo
Orchestration Layer: LangChain + CrewAI / AutoGen for multi-agent collaboration
Context Layer: Azure Cognitive Search + Cosmos DB (vector store)
Integration Layer: REST APIs, Logic Apps, and Power Automate connectors
Visualization: Power BI + Copilot, Miro AI
Security & Governance: Azure AI Content Safety, Responsible AI Dashboard, Data Masking Layer
🎯 How to Speak This in Interview (2-min Summary)
“As part of our EA modernization, I introduced an Agentic AI operating model.We deployed specialized AI agents — an EA Copilot Agent built on Azure OpenAI + LangChain, a Governance Agent monitoring compliance through Jira API integration, a Technology Radar Agent using GPT-4 with custom RAG, and a Knowledge Agent integrated with Confluence and Teams for on-demand architectural insights.These agents worked together through a CrewAI orchestration layer, sharing context via Azure Cognitive Search and Cosmos DB.This reduced EA documentation and review effort by over 50%, improved compliance accuracy, and made our architecture governance cognitive, proactive, and insight-driven.”
Perfect — now we’re talking realistic, enterprise-level GenAI / Agentic AI capabilities delivered as part of an EA modernization program. I’ll frame this like a production-grade banking implementation, covering: problem, solution, EA principles & standards, deployment, AI lifecycle, benefits, and monitoring.
I’ll structure it in a way you can walk the interviewer through step-by-step, making it very credible.
1️⃣ GenAI/Agentic AI Capabilities Delivered in the EA Modernization Program
Capability 1: EA Copilot for Architecture Governance
Problem:
EA documentation, architecture review preparation, and compliance checks were manual, time-consuming, and inconsistent.
EARB/SARB meetings required 2–3 weeks prep for each program.
Solution Delivered:
Developed an AI-powered EA Copilot that ingests existing architecture artifacts (Confluence, Jira, PDFs, CMDB), and generates:
Architecture diagrams (ArchiMate)
Design compliance summaries
Review board slides
Embedded principles & standards:
Principle: “Every design must be traceable to capability and business goal”
Standard: Templates for EA artifacts, RAG evaluation (Red-Amber-Green) for compliance
Deployment Pattern:
Hosted on Azure OpenAI GPT-4 Turbo
Retrieval layer: Azure Cognitive Search / Cosmos DB (vector store)
Agent orchestration: LangChain / CrewAI
Integrated with Confluence, Jira, and Teams via APIs
AI Lifecycle:
Training/Context: Fed past architecture documents & decision logs
Inference: Generates summaries and diagrams on-demand
Monitoring: Tracks accuracy via feedback loop with architects (AIOps-style monitoring for AI output quality)
Benefits:
EA documentation prep reduced by 50%
EARB review cycle cut from 2 weeks → 3 days
Improved decision traceability & compliance visibility
Capability 2: AI-driven Application Rationalization
Problem:
Legacy banking applications (~200+) needed rationalization — decisions were manual and slow.
Risk of redundant platforms, higher cost, and inconsistent modernization.
Solution Delivered:
Application Rationalization Agent:
Uses GenAI (GPT-4) + knowledge graph to suggest “Retire / Rehost / Replatform / Refactor” for each application.
Standards & Principles:
Principle: “Applications must support ≥1 critical business capability and follow cloud-native patterns”
Standard: Reuse only approved technology stack (Spring Boot, Kafka, AKS)
Deployment Pattern:
Agent queries LeanIX / CMDB / asset metadata
Generates rationalization report for review in SARB
Stores results in EA repository (LeanIX / Neo4j)
AI Lifecycle:
Context ingestion: app inventory, usage metrics, cost, SLA, and tech stack
Inference: scoring apps for retire/rehost/replatform decisions
Continuous learning: updates recommendations as usage patterns change
Benefits:
Reduced rationalization effort by 70%
Cost reduction on legacy platforms (~15–20% TCO)
Faster decision-making and modernization alignment
Capability 3: AI-powered Tech Radar & Innovation Insights
Problem:
Manual tech scouting was slow; new frameworks, open-source tools, or cloud services often adopted without governance, causing risk and sprawl.
Solution Delivered:
Technology Radar Agent:
Monitors GitHub, cloud updates, vendor announcements, regulatory updates
Classifies tech into Adopt / Trial / Assess / Hold using GenAI reasoning
Standards & Principles:
Principle: “All new technology must comply with EA reference architecture”
Standard: Evaluate for security, scalability, regulatory compliance, and cloud compatibility
Deployment Pattern:
Multi-agent orchestration (LangChain) with RAG for document retrieval
PowerBI dashboards with AI-generated recommendations
Alerts sent to Tech Council for decision
AI Lifecycle:
Ingestion: Tech trends, internal architecture, compliance constraints
Reasoning & scoring: GPT-4 evaluates alignment with enterprise principles
Feedback: Tech Council approves or rejects; agent learns
Benefits:
Reduced manual evaluation effort by 40%
Increased standardization and innovation visibility
Continuous proactive tech insight for CXO decision-making
Capability 4: GenAI for Compliance and Risk Monitoring
Problem:
Manual review of architecture and design logs for regulatory compliance (RBI, SEBI, PCI DSS) was error-prone and delayed.
Solution Delivered:
Risk & Compliance Agent:
Scans architecture review notes, Jira tickets, cloud policies
Flags deviations and suggests mitigations automatically
Standards & Principles:
Principle: “All systems must be compliant with RBI / SEBI / PCI DSS and EA standards”
Standard: Automated risk scoring for each project
Deployment Pattern:
GPT-4 for reasoning + LangChain for orchestration
Integration with Azure Sentinel for security events
Reports to EARB and Risk team
AI Lifecycle:
Continuous monitoring (AIOps-style)
Generates weekly dashboard KPIs: % compliant, % exceptions, open risks
Benefits:
Reduced compliance review cycle by 60%
Early risk detection prevents audit penalties
Improved governance and CXO visibility
Capability 5: Conversational EA Knowledge Agent
Problem:
Architects and developers often need quick access to standards, blueprints, and past decisions — manual search is slow.
Solution Delivered:
Knowledge Management Agent / “Ask the EA” Chatbot
LLM-powered conversational interface
Integrated with Confluence, SharePoint, LeanIX
Standards & Principles:
Principle: “Knowledge must be available on-demand, in a secure manner”
Standard: Only approved EA artifacts accessible, PII masked
Deployment Pattern:
GPT-4 with RAG from repository
Vector DB: Azure Cosmos DB / Pinecone
Frontend: MS Teams + Web UI
AI Lifecycle:
Continuous learning from Q&A sessions
Monitored for accuracy and relevance
Benefits:
Reduced time to find EA guidance from hours → seconds
Increased adoption of standards and reuse patterns
AI Lifecycle & Operational Model
Aspect | Approach |
Development | Fine-tune LLMs on enterprise artifacts, regulatory docs, tech standards |
Deployment | Cloud-native microservices (AKS), API-first, secure endpoints |
Orchestration | Multi-agent framework (LangChain, CrewAI) for autonomous collaboration |
Monitoring | AIOps dashboards: accuracy, performance, compliance, retraining alerts |
MLOps / AIOps | CI/CD pipelines for model updates, testing, versioning, and retraining with governance approval |
Security & Compliance | Data masking, policy-as-code, audit logs, RBAC, regulatory guardrails |
End-to-End Solution Flow (Simplified)
EA Repository & Knowledge Graph: Stores all artifacts, standards, reference architectures
GenAI Agents: Copilot, Tech Radar, Rationalization, Compliance, Knowledge
Multi-Agent Orchestration: LangChain / CrewAI coordinates tasks, sharing context
Integration Layer: APIs to Jira, Confluence, CMDB, cloud policy systems
Output Layer:
Automated review reports
EA dashboards in PowerBI
Chatbot / Copilot access for architects
Alerts for CXO / Tech Council
Monitoring & Feedback: Closed-loop AIOps / MLOps for retraining and improvement
Business & Technical Benefits
Dimension | Before AI | After AI |
EA documentation & review | 2–3 weeks | 2–3 days |
Rationalization effort | 6 months | 3 weeks |
Compliance checks | Manual, error-prone | Automated, 95% accurate |
Knowledge access | Hours to search | Seconds via chatbot |
Technology evaluation | Ad-hoc | Continuous & proactive |
1️⃣ EA Copilot Agent — Architecture Documentation & Governance
Purpose / Problem:
Manual architecture documentation, review prep, and compliance checks were slow and inconsistent.
Preparing for EARB/SARB meetings took 2–3 weeks.
How Agent Works:
Input Provided:
EA artifacts: Confluence pages, Jira tickets, CMDB data, architecture diagrams (PDFs, Word)
EA standards & principles
Past architecture decisions & review logs
Processing:
GPT-4 Turbo ingests text and semi-structured data
LangChain orchestrates retrieval of context (RAG) from EA repository
Auto-generates:
Summary reports
Architecture diagrams (ArchiMate style via diagram templates)
Compliance checks vs standards
Output Generated:
EA Copilot report: ready for review
Highlighted deviations from EA principles
Slide decks for EARB/SARB meetings
Operation / Run:
Architects trigger agent via Teams chatbot or Web UI
Agent queries repository, generates documents in minutes
Feedback loop allows retraining / adjustment
Benefit:
Documentation prep time reduced 50%, review cycle shortened from 2 weeks → 3 days
2️⃣ Application Rationalization Agent — App Lifecycle Decisions
Purpose / Problem:
Legacy application rationalization was manual, slow, and inconsistent.
Needed automated retire/rehost/replatform decisions.
How Agent Works:
Input Provided:
Application inventory from CMDB / LeanIX
Metadata: business criticality, usage stats, cost, SLA
Technology stack and cloud readiness info
Processing:
GPT-4 + LangChain reasoning agent evaluates applications against:
EA principles (reuse, cloud-native)
Enterprise standards (approved tech stack)
Knowledge graph in Neo4j models relationships between apps, capabilities, and business units
Output Generated:
Rationalization report: Retire / Rehost / Replatform / Refactor suggestions
Risk and impact summary for each recommendation
Operation / Run:
Scheduled batch or on-demand via Web portal
Reviewed by SARB / BU leads
Feedback loop incorporated for continuous improvement
Benefit:
Rationalization effort reduced by 70%, faster modernization
3️⃣ Technology Radar Agent — Continuous Tech Evaluation
Purpose / Problem:
Manual scanning of new technologies led to delayed adoption or risky technology choices.
How Agent Works:
Input Provided:
Tech sources: GitHub, cloud provider release notes, regulatory updates
Enterprise standards, architecture principles
Processing:
GPT-4 reasoning agent scores new technologies: Adopt / Trial / Assess / Hold
Multi-agent orchestration via LangChain for trend analysis & risk scoring
Output Generated:
Weekly “Tech Radar” dashboard
Suggested tech adoption aligned to enterprise architecture
Operation / Run:
Agent runs weekly batch jobs
Results reviewed by Tech Council
Continuous learning from approvals/rejections
Benefit:
Tech evaluation effort reduced 40%, proactive alignment with EA standards
4️⃣ Risk & Compliance Agent — Automated Governance Monitoring
Purpose / Problem:
Manual compliance checks of architecture and cloud designs were error-prone.
How Agent Works:
Input Provided:
Architecture review logs, Jira tickets, cloud policy configs
Regulatory policies (RBI, SEBI, PCI DSS)
EA standards
Processing:
GPT-4 reasoning + LangChain evaluates deviations
Assigns risk score to each project / application
Output Generated:
Compliance exceptions report
Alerts for non-compliant architecture or cloud design
KPIs for CXO dashboards
Operation / Run:
Agent runs continuously (AIOps monitoring)
Sends automated reports to EARB / Risk Committee
Feedback loop incorporated for policy updates
Benefit:
Compliance reviews automated, 95%+ accuracy, audit-ready reports
5️⃣ Knowledge Management Agent — Conversational EA Guidance
Purpose / Problem:
Architects and developers needed quick, on-demand access to standards, patterns, and EA decisions.
How Agent Works:
Input Provided:
EA repository: Confluence, SharePoint, LeanIX
EA standards & patterns
Past Q&A / decisions
Processing:
GPT-4 with RAG searches repository
Multi-turn conversation handling via LangChain
Output Generated:
Answers architecture questions via chatbot (Teams or Web UI)
Links to relevant artifacts
Operation / Run:
Users ask questions in Teams or web interface
Agent retrieves, summarizes, and presents answers instantly
Feedback logged for continuous improvement
Benefit:
Knowledge retrieval time reduced from hours → seconds
Improved adoption of EA standards
6️⃣ Cloud Blueprint / DevOps Agent — IaC & SDLC Automation
Purpose / Problem:
Manual cloud blueprint creation and CI/CD setup caused delays and inconsistency.
How Agent Works:
Input Provided:
EA reference architecture standards
Security policies, cloud account info
Application requirements
Processing:
GPT-4 + LangChain code agents generate IaC templates (Terraform/Bicep)
DevOps pipeline templates generated via GitHub Copilot / Azure DevOps Copilot
Output Generated:
IaC scripts for cloud deployment (AKS, Kafka, API Gateway)
CI/CD pipelines for automated deployment
Operation / Run:
Triggered on project initiation
Integrated with CI/CD pipelines for continuous updates
Monitored for compliance and policy adherence
Benefit:
Deployment time reduced 30–40%, standardization enforced across environments
“For each capability, we built a specialized AI agent — e.g., EA Copilot for documentation, Rationalization Agent for app lifecycle, Tech Radar Agent for innovation, Risk & Compliance Agent, Knowledge Agent, and Cloud/DevOps Agents. Each agent ingests structured and unstructured enterprise data, applies GenAI reasoning via GPT-4 with multi-agent orchestration (LangChain), generates outputs like dashboards, reports, recommendations, or code, and feeds results to EA boards and CXO dashboards. All agents have feedback loops for continuous improvement, forming an AIOps / MLOps cycle for enterprise architecture.”
🛠️ Custom Development vs. COTS
While there are no out-of-the-box COTS products that exactly match the capabilities of the agents you've described, several platforms and tools can be leveraged to build these functionalities:
Microsoft Copilot Studio: For building custom AI agents within the Microsoft 365 ecosystem.
ServiceNow APM: For application portfolio management and rationalization.
ThoughtWorks Technology Radar: For categorizing and evaluating technologies.
Ardoq: For risk and compliance assessments within enterprise architecture.
USU Knowledge Management AI Agents: For automating knowledge management tasks.
By integrating these tools with existing EA platforms like LeanIX or Sparx EA, organizations can effectively implement the capabilities you're aiming for.
1️⃣ Traditional AI vs GenAI in Portfolio Recommendation
Aspect | Traditional AI / ML | GenAI (LLM-based) |
Input | Structured data (portfolio, market data, risk score) | Structured + unstructured data (market news, analyst reports, regulatory updates) |
Output | Numerical recommendation (allocation %, risk score) | Human-readable advice, rationale, explanations, answers questions, can generate reports, FAQs, emails |
Flexibility | Limited — needs retraining for new scenarios | Flexible — can reason about new scenarios, compliance rules, risk trade-offs without full retraining |
Explainability | Statistical / formulaic | Natural-language explanations, audit-ready rationale |
Multi-agent orchestration | Usually single model or rules | Can have multiple agents: Risk, Recommendation, Compliance, Hallucination Filter, Knowledge Agent |
2️⃣ Why GenAI in this scenario?
Explainable Advice:
Traditional AI might output 50% Equity, 30% Debt, 20% Hybrid
GenAI can also output:
“Equity Fund A 50%: Provides growth aligned with 10-year horizon; Debt Fund B 30%: Ensures stability; Hybrid Fund C 20%: Balances risk-return while staying compliant with SEBI rules.”
Compliance Validation:
GenAI agents can reason about rules, regulations, and dynamically adjust allocations.
For example: “Moderate risk investors must not exceed 60% equity — adjusting allocation accordingly.”
RAG / Knowledge Integration:
GenAI can combine structured data (portfolio, market NAVs) with unstructured knowledge: analyst reports, market news, regulations, past advisory rationale.
Interactive / Conversational Advisory:
Customers can ask follow-ups:
“Why is my equity allocation 50%?”
GenAI can answer naturally using context, rules, and reasoning.
Hallucination Filtering & Explainability:
GenAI multi-agent setup ensures outputs are validated, explainable, auditable — not just numbers.
3️⃣ Key Point for Interviews
Traditional AI can generate numbers, but GenAI enables reasoning, explanation, compliance validation, and multi-source knowledge integration.
In short: numbers + human-readable rationale + dynamic compliance reasoning → that’s why GenAI is used in portfolio recommendation modernization.
.png)

Comments