top of page

enterprise strategy for building a new mutual fund platform on Azure?

  • Writer: Anand Nerurkar
    Anand Nerurkar
  • Apr 29
  • 4 min read

How would you define your overall enterprise strategy for building a new mutual fund platform on Azure?


Enterprise Strategy for Mutual Fund Platform on Azure


1️⃣ Business-Aligned Vision

My strategy begins by anchoring technology to business outcomes: Delivering a frictionless investor experience Enabling SEBI-compliant operations Supporting rapid fund product rollout Achieving high availability, resilience, and cost efficiency

This requires a modular, cloud-native platform that’s built for scale, compliance, and change.


2️⃣ Target Architecture Strategy

I would adopt a microservices-based, API-first, and event-driven architecture with:
  • Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) for orchestrating containerized workloads

  • Azure API Management for secure and scalable API exposure

  • Azure Service Bus / Event Grid for asynchronous, decoupled communication

  • Istio or Dapr for service mesh and resiliency patterns

  • Cosmos DB + Azure SQL for polyglot persistence based on use case

This design supports domain isolation, regulatory traceability, and independent service evolution.


3️⃣ DevSecOps & Delivery Excellence

To accelerate delivery and ensure quality:
  • CI/CD automation with Azure DevOps or GitHub Actions

  • Infrastructure as Code with Terraform/Bicep

  • Security and compliance embedded into the pipeline via static code analysis, dependency checks, policy scans

  • Support for Blue/Green and Canary deployments with observability baked in (Azure Monitor, App Insights)


4️⃣ Security, Risk & Compliance First

Security and compliance are non-negotiable, especially in BFSI. My approach:
  • Zero Trust identity model (Azure AD, RBAC, PIM, NSGs)

  • Data encryption in-transit/at-rest (managed via Key Vault)

  • Continuous compliance via Azure Defender, Policy, Security Center

  • Adherence to SEBI, ISO 27001, NIST frameworks through governance automation


5️⃣ Execution & Governance Model

I would run the transformation in 3 agile waves:
  • Wave 1: MVP – eKYC, investor onboarding, portfolio dashboard

  • Wave 2: Core orchestration – investment engine, redemption, NAV calculator

  • Wave 3: Intelligence & scale – fraud analytics, RPA integration, AI agents


With Architecture Review Boards, capability-driven teams, and clear KPIs tied to business outcomes (e.g., onboarding TAT, uptime, API latency, investor satisfaction).


Enterprise Risk and Mitigation Plan

===

Risk Category

Risk Description

Mitigation Plan

Business

Misalignment with mutual fund business goals

Run value stream mapping with business stakeholders

Business

Inadequate regulatory coverage (SEBI, RBI)

Implement compliance-by-design using Azure Policy

Business

Poor investor adoption due to UX issues

UX testing and investor journey simulation

Business

Delayed go-to-market for fund products

Agile delivery with MVP-led release cycles

Business

Vendor lock-in with Azure services

Cloud-agnostic abstractions and exit strategy planning

Business

Weak executive sponsorship

Establish steering committee with CXO alignment

Business

Inability to scale with AUM growth

AKS auto-scaling and modular service design

Business

Unclear value realization from digitization

Define outcome KPIs and track quarterly

Business

Unstable partnership ecosystem

Formalize vendor and fintech partnership SLAs

Business

Misalignment of IT and business roadmaps

Align enterprise architecture with OKRs and roadmap

Technology

Distributed monolith instead of clean microservices

Domain-driven design with strict bounded contexts

Technology

Inconsistent API contracts and governance

API gateway governance and OpenAPI enforcement

Technology

Latency issues during peak NAV calculations

Use Azure Front Door, Redis, and async queues

Technology

Improper use of Azure services for workloads

Run architecture reviews for workload fitment

Technology

Inadequate logging and tracing

Centralized logging with Azure Monitor + App Insights

Technology

Poorly tuned database queries

Query optimization and indexing strategies

Technology

Dependency bottlenecks between services

Decouple services with queues and retries

Technology

Lack of caching for frequently accessed data

Leverage Azure Cache for Redis

Technology

Data duplication across services

Use central data contracts and CDC patterns

Technology

Failure of third-party integrations (e.g., RTA, KYC)

Use fallback, retries, and mock services

People

Skill gaps in Azure, DevSecOps, or Kubernetes

Training, certifications, and mentoring programs

People

Resistance to agile/DevOps culture

Run agile maturity assessments and retros

People

Role ambiguity in cross-functional teams

RACI matrix and clear role charters

People

Poor stakeholder engagement

Weekly stakeholder syncs and feedback loops

People

High attrition of key technical talent

Retention strategy with recognition and career growth

People

Low maturity in SRE/observability practices

Introduce SRE playbooks and observability champions

People

Burnout due to transformation pace

Realistic sprint planning with buffer zones

People

Inadequate onboarding for new tools/processes

Tool onboarding guides and sandbox environments

People

Lack of domain understanding in tech teams

Domain workshops with business SMEs

People

Ineffective internal knowledge sharing

Internal wiki and knowledge sharing forums

Operations

Lack of a disaster recovery (DR) plan

Implement Azure Site Recovery and DR drills

Operations

Inconsistent environment configurations

IaC templates and pipeline validation checks

Operations

Manual deployments causing errors

Fully automate deployments with blue/green rollout

Operations

Azure cost sprawl due to mismanaged resources

Cost governance with tagging and budgets

Operations

No SLA enforcement with vendors

Include SLA metrics in vendor contracts

Operations

Inadequate test automation

Build unit + integration test coverage into pipelines

Operations

Infrequent performance and load testing

Run JMeter and k6 tests monthly

Operations

Data sync issues across microservices

Event-driven consistency and compensating actions

Operations

No proactive monitoring for API failures

Set up alerts for key APIs using Azure Monitor

Operations

Unclear incident response processes

Document and simulate incident response scenarios

Security & Compliance

Insecure APIs exposing sensitive data

Use Azure API Management policies and scans

Security & Compliance

Misconfigured IAM/RBAC policies

Review IAM roles and enforce least privilege

Security & Compliance

No encryption for PII or transactional data

Encrypt all data using Azure Key Vault

Security & Compliance

Lack of audit trails for compliance

Enable audit logs in Azure Monitor and Sentinel

Security & Compliance

Insecure container images in ACR

Scan container images using Defender for Containers

Security & Compliance

Insufficient API throttling and rate limiting

Implement API Gateway throttling policies

Security & Compliance

Unpatched libraries and dependencies

Run dependency checks in CI pipeline

Security & Compliance

Lack of regular pen testing

Schedule quarterly external penetration tests

Security & Compliance

Non-compliance with SEBI/ISO 27001/NIST

Automate compliance via Azure Security Center

Security & Compliance

No DLP or anti-fraud mechanisms

Integrate anti-fraud APIs and Azure DLP policies


Closing Statement:

The strategy ensures a secure, scalable, and regulation-compliant mutual fund platform that enables faster innovation and measurable business value — all fully powered by Azure’s native capabilities.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Ops Efficiency 30 % improvement

how did you achieve 30 % operational efficiency Achieving 30% operational efficiency in a BFSI-grade, microservices-based personal...

 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2024 by AeeroTech. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page