top of page

EA Q & A

  • Writer: Anand Nerurkar
    Anand Nerurkar
  • Sep 14
  • 11 min read

🧱 ENTERPRISE ARCHITECT – MOCK INTERVIEW Q&A

1. How do you align enterprise architecture with business goals?

Answer:I start by understanding the organization's strategic goals through stakeholder workshops. Then I develop a business capability map and align IT initiatives to those capabilities. I use tools like TOGAF's ADM to create an architecture roadmap that connects business outcomes to technology enablers. Regular steering committee meetings help ensure ongoing alignment and refinement.

2. How do you govern architecture decisions across a large enterprise?

Answer:I establish an Architecture Review Board (ARB) with cross-functional representation. I define decision-making frameworks, architecture principles, and compliance checklists. We evaluate all new initiatives for alignment with reference architecture. I also implement architecture KPIs, like reduction in tech debt and reuse of standard components.

3. Describe a scenario where you led digital transformation.

Answer:In my previous role at a bank, I led a digital lending transformation. We built a microservices-based platform that integrated with a credit scoring ML engine and legacy systems via APIs. We phased the rollout using domain-driven design and implemented CI/CD pipelines. The result was a 40% reduction in loan approval time and increased customer satisfaction.

4. How do you evaluate new technologies like GenAI or Blockchain?

Answer:I use a structured evaluation matrix: business value, tech maturity, ecosystem, integration feasibility, security, and compliance. For GenAI, I conduct use case discovery workshops and PoCs to validate feasibility. I also set up governance policies for ethical usage, especially in BFSI.

5. What’s your approach to managing technical debt?

Answer:I catalog technical debt during architecture assessments and classify it by impact. I then integrate debt reduction into the product backlog, prioritizing based on business risk. I also advocate for setting aside capacity in each sprint to address critical debt areas.

☁️ CLOUD ARCHITECT – MOCK INTERVIEW Q&A

1. What’s your approach to designing a multi-cloud strategy?

Answer:I begin by identifying business drivers: cost, risk, compliance, and service availability. Then I design a vendor-agnostic architecture using containers (e.g., Kubernetes) and IaC (Terraform). For resilience, I include cross-cloud failover. I also define guardrails for cost control, security policies, and centralized monitoring using tools like Datadog or Prometheus.

2. How do you ensure security and compliance in cloud environments?

Answer:I follow the principle of “security by design.” I use CSPM tools, encryption at rest and transit, IAM policies, and audit trails. For compliance (e.g., RBI, GDPR), I use automated policy enforcement via tools like OPA and define cloud governance using frameworks like NIST CSF or CSA CCM.

3. How do you optimize cloud costs?

Answer:First, I set up cost visibility via tagging and dashboards. Then I implement autoscaling, right-sizing, spot instances, and reserved capacity. I regularly review usage patterns and set up alerts for anomalies. I also educate developers on cost-aware design.

4. Describe your DevOps/DevSecOps implementation approach.

Answer:I use IaC (Terraform), CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions, Jenkins), and container orchestration (EKS/GKE). For DevSecOps, I integrate static and dynamic security scans, container image validation, and secret management tools like HashiCorp Vault. Security gates are enforced as part of the pipeline.

5. Can you walk us through a high-availability cloud architecture you’ve designed?

Answer:For a payment processing app, I designed a multi-AZ, auto-scaled architecture on AWS. It used ALB, stateless services behind ASGs, RDS with multi-AZ and read replicas, and S3 for object storage. I integrated CloudFront for low-latency delivery and used Route 53 with health checks for DNS-based failover.



1. Q: How do you ensure that enterprise architecture aligns with business strategy?

A:I start by understanding the organization's strategic objectives through direct engagement with business stakeholders. Then, I map these objectives to business capabilities and identify enabling technologies. I use tools like capability models, value stream mapping, and TOGAF’s Architecture Development Method (ADM) to trace alignment. Regular architecture reviews and KPIs help ensure continuous alignment as business needs evolve.

2. Q: Explain your approach to cloud adoption in a legacy-heavy enterprise.

A:I follow a structured Cloud Adoption Framework:

  1. Assess: Evaluate current infrastructure, workloads, and application readiness.

  2. Define Strategy: Choose between rehost, refactor, or replatform based on business value and constraints.

  3. Prioritize: Start with low-risk workloads or those offering quick wins.

  4. Plan Migration: Use tools like AWS Migration Hub or Azure Migrate.

  5. Governance: Establish FinOps, security guardrails, landing zones.

  6. Scale: Expand to mission-critical workloads using DevSecOps practices.

I also ensure stakeholder alignment through workshops and regular steering committee reviews.

3. Q: Describe a scenario where you used GenAI in an enterprise context.

A:In a banking context, I implemented a GenAI-powered advisory assistant. It used Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) on internal product manuals, risk profiles, and customer transaction history. We integrated it into a web app for advisors to instantly generate personalized investment options.

Key considerations included:

  • Data security (PII masking),

  • Bias and hallucination control,

  • Audit trail and feedback loop, and

  • Using private LLM deployment on Azure OpenAI to meet compliance needs.

4. Q: What’s your method for defining a Target State Architecture?

A:I use a layered approach:

  • Business Layer: Business capabilities and value streams

  • Application Layer: Functional services, integration patterns

  • Data Layer: Data flows, storage, governance

  • Technology Layer: Infra, cloud platforms, network, security

  • Security & Ops: IAM, observability, DevSecOps

I define principles (e.g., API-first, zero trust), identify building blocks (reusable patterns), and produce artifacts like heat maps and reference models. I validate the architecture via stakeholder workshops and readiness assessments.

5. Q: How do you measure the success of a cloud transformation program?

A:I define KPIs across four dimensions:

  • Business Value: Revenue uplift, cost reduction, time to market

  • Operational Efficiency: MTTR, deployment frequency, availability

  • Security & Compliance: Policy adherence, zero critical vulnerabilities

  • User Experience: Latency, NPS, customer retention

I also establish governance dashboards and use tools like AWS Cost Explorer, Azure Monitor, and Jira dashboards for transparent tracking. Regular reviews with business owners ensure alignment.

6. Q: How do you handle conflicting priorities between architecture teams and delivery teams?

A:I act as a facilitator by:

  • Creating a shared backlog of architectural and delivery priorities

  • Using Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) to justify trade-offs

  • Implementing Just Enough Architecture to avoid overdesign

  • Aligning architecture epics with program increments in SAFe

  • Maintaining open channels like architecture guilds and design forums

I emphasize business outcomes over technical purity, ensuring solutions are pragmatic and aligned.

7. Q: What’s your approach to evaluating and selecting cloud-native technologies (e.g., Kubernetes vs Serverless)?

A:I use a decision framework based on:

  • Use Case: Long-running vs bursty workloads

  • Scalability: Auto-scaling needs

  • Ops Overhead: Managed vs DIY

  • Cost: Consumption-based pricing vs infra cost

  • Compliance: Region, VPC, and data handling

  • Team Maturity: Skills available internally

For example, for short-lived API services, I prefer serverless (e.g., AWS Lambda); for multi-container orchestration with custom networking, Kubernetes (EKS/GKE) is better.

8. Q: How do you incorporate security into your enterprise architecture?

A:I use the "security by design" approach:

  • Define security architecture principles (e.g., least privilege, defense in depth)

  • Use Zero Trust Architecture

  • Enforce IAM policies, encryption standards, network segmentation

  • Integrate SIEM tools and security gates into DevSecOps pipelines

  • Conduct threat modeling (STRIDE) at the design stage

I also engage InfoSec early and embed security champions into delivery teams.

9. Q: How do you create an architecture governance model in a scaled enterprise?

A:I establish:

  • Architecture Review Board (ARB) with stakeholders across business and tech

  • Governance playbook including decision rights, RACI matrix

  • Templates & reference architectures to promote consistency

  • Lightweight checkpoints during SDLC (inception, design, implementation)

  • Tooling like LeanIX or Ardoq for EA visualization and impact analysis

Governance must be adaptive—not bureaucratic. I balance control with agility.

10. Q: Can you describe a time when your architecture decision significantly impacted business performance?

A:At a financial services firm, I led the move from a monolithic core to a microservices-based payments platform on the cloud. The result:

  • Transaction processing time dropped by 60%

  • New product launches accelerated from 3 months to 3 weeks

  • Infra cost reduced by ~25% due to right-sizing and spot instances

  • Uptime improved to 99.98%

I aligned tech with product roadmaps and established SLOs for every service.


🔹 Mock Interview Q&A – Set 3: Advanced EA + Cloud Architecture

1. Q: How do you balance innovation with enterprise stability when adopting emerging technologies like GenAI?

A:I apply a bimodal architecture approach:

  • Mode 1 focuses on stability: critical systems with strong governance.

  • Mode 2 enables innovation: isolated sandbox or feature teams experimenting with GenAI.

I evaluate innovations through tech radar reviews, define guardrails (ethical use, data scope), and use pilot programs before scaling. This ensures emerging tech like GenAI brings value without compromising existing operations.

2. Q: Describe your approach to designing a multi-cloud architecture.

A:My multi-cloud architecture approach includes:

  • Workload Distribution: Match workload needs to cloud strengths (e.g., Azure for ML, GCP for analytics).

  • Common Abstractions: Use containers (K8s), Terraform, and service meshes (Istio) for portability.

  • Identity Federation: Centralized IAM with SSO/SAML.

  • Observability: Unified dashboards via tools like Datadog or OpenTelemetry.

  • Data Replication: Cloud-agnostic data lakes or CDC-based replication (e.g., Debezium).

I avoid “lowest common denominator” approaches and instead focus on interoperability with intentional diversity.

3. Q: How would you design an enterprise data architecture for AI readiness?

A:I follow a layered data architecture:

  • Source Layer: Operational systems, APIs, streaming feeds.

  • Ingestion Layer: Kafka or EventBridge for real-time, batch via Glue/Dataflow.

  • Storage Layer: Data Lakehouse (Delta/Snowflake/Iceberg) with governance.

  • Processing Layer: dbt for transformation, Spark for large-scale compute.

  • ML Feature Store: For model reuse across teams.

  • Access Layer: APIs, notebooks, and BI tools with RBAC.

To make it AI-ready, I ensure metadata tagging, lineage, data quality, and model versioning with tools like MLflow.

4. Q: How do you manage architectural debt in a fast-paced delivery environment?

A:I manage architectural debt by:

  • Cataloging it in an ADR repository or backlog

  • Assigning technical debt KPIs (e.g., code complexity, outdated components)

  • Allocating “debt remediation” sprints

  • Making it visible to product owners through cost-of-change impact

  • Implementing “exit criteria” on features that must clean up debt before go-live

Architecture debt is inevitable—but it must be tracked and consciously managed like any other backlog item.

5. Q: How do you integrate business and technology roadmaps?

A:I establish an Enterprise Capability Model as the common language:

  • Map business initiatives to capabilities.

  • Align tech enablers (APIs, platforms, data, AI) to each capability.

  • Use portfolio tools (e.g., Jira Align, Planview) to track both views.

  • Synchronize milestones and dependencies via quarterly planning cycles (QBRs).

This allows bidirectional traceability—from strategy to system and back. I also run joint roadmap reviews with business and tech leads.

6. Q: How do you approach cost optimization in cloud architecture?

A:I focus on three levers:

  1. Design-Time Efficiency:

    • Use serverless, autoscaling, spot instances.

    • Right-size early via cost modeling (AWS Cost Calculator).

  2. Runtime Monitoring:

    • Set up cost dashboards (e.g., AWS Cost Explorer, GCP Billing Export).

    • Alert on anomalies and unused resources.

  3. Governance & Controls:

    • Tagging policies, budgets, reserved instances planning.

    • Educate teams with FinOps practices (showback/chargeback).

Cloud efficiency = architecture + awareness + accountability.

7. Q: Tell me about a time when your architecture was challenged by stakeholders. How did you handle it?

A:At a large bank, I proposed moving risk models to a cloud-native platform. The quant team raised concerns about latency, data residency, and audit trails.

I responded by:

  • Creating a proof-of-concept with local compute + cloud storage.

  • Mapping out compliance adherence in a RACI matrix.

  • Running a joint architecture workshop to co-create the solution.

Eventually, we reached a hybrid architecture using cloud burst + local orchestration, satisfying both innovation and risk requirements.

8. Q: What’s your strategy for modernizing a monolithic application portfolio?

A:

  1. Inventory & Assess: Tech stack, business value, complexity (Strangler pattern fit?)

  2. Segment & Prioritize: High-value apps first (e.g., APIs, customer-facing)

  3. Choose Modernization Path:

    • Rehost (quick wins)

    • Replatform (minor upgrades)

    • Refactor (for critical long-term value)

  4. Implement Strangler Pattern: Isolate and replace modules incrementally.

  5. CI/CD Enablement: Containerize and deploy on K8s/cloud

  6. Continuous Testing & Monitoring: Ensure confidence during the transition

It’s not a one-size-fits-all—it’s surgical and value-driven.

9. Q: How do you ensure consistency in architectural decisions across distributed teams?

A:

  • Maintain a central architecture repository with approved patterns and reference implementations.

  • Use Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for traceability.

  • Set up a federated architecture team—central team + domain architects.

  • Conduct Tech Design Clinics weekly for peer reviews.

  • Automate enforcement via CI/CD quality gates (e.g., dependency checks, security scans).

The goal is to foster alignment without stifling team autonomy.

10. Q: If given a blank slate, how would you structure an enterprise architecture practice?

A:I’d set it up with the following pillars:

  1. Strategy: Link to business objectives via capabilities and OKRs.

  2. Execution: Maintain roadmap, decision logs, and delivery support.

  3. Governance: Lightweight ARB, review checklists, design standards.

  4. Tools: Use modeling tools (Sparx/LeanIX), dashboards, Confluence.

  5. Communication: Monthly architecture newsletters, workshops, guilds.

  6. Innovation: Sandbox environments, tech radar, POCs


🔹 Scenario-Based Case Studies – Mock Interview

Each case is followed by how to structure your response + example answer highlights.

Case 1: Cloud-Native Transformation of a Core Banking System

Scenario:You're hired by a mid-sized bank to lead the transformation of their monolithic core banking system into a modern cloud-native platform. The system is highly customized, has tight coupling between services, and must maintain 99.99% availability.

Question:How will you approach this transformation from both an EA and cloud architecture perspective?

How to Answer:

  • Start with Assessment & Stakeholder Alignment

  • Identify Business Drivers: cost, agility, resilience, etc.

  • Use the Strangler Pattern for modernization

  • Define Target State Architecture: microservices, API gateways, service mesh

  • Plan Cloud Migration Strategy (e.g., rehost → refactor)

  • Add RAID log and mitigation

  • Build a multi-phase roadmap

Answer Highlights:

  • API-layer first to decouple UI

  • High-risk components (e.g., core ledger) isolated last

  • Adopt containerization, CI/CD pipelines, observability stack

  • Keep fallback plan via Blue-Green or Canary deployment

  • Roadmap includes DevSecOps, training, and interim state checkpoints

Case 2: Introducing GenAI in a Regulated Environment

Scenario:You're tasked with introducing GenAI-powered customer support in an insurance company. Leadership is excited, but legal, compliance, and security teams are cautious.

Question:How will you design the architecture and lead the initiative?

How to Answer:

  • Start with Business Use Case: e.g., claims FAQ, policy advisory

  • Map to Capabilities + Data Domains

  • Identify Security & Compliance Needs (e.g., PII masking, audit logs)

  • Choose a deployment model: private LLM, on-prem inference, or SaaS?

  • Define RAG architecture

  • Setup pilot → feedback → refine → scale

Answer Highlights:

  • Use private LLM on Azure with built-in compliance

  • Retrieval layer uses chunked policy docs stored in vector DB (e.g., Pinecone)

  • Add feedback loop for model retraining

  • Include audit logs, hallucination detection filters

  • Run POC with agents first, not customer-facing yet

  • Mitigation: Legal engagement early, explainability-first mindset

Case 3: Business-IT Alignment for a Digital Transformation Program

Scenario:A large NBFC wants to digitize its loan origination and servicing lifecycle. Business has defined aggressive timelines, but tech debt is high and alignment is lacking.

Question:How would you bring architectural governance and alignment?

How to Answer:

  • Define Business Capability Model: map goals to capabilities

  • Identify gaps between current and target state

  • Co-create an Enterprise Architecture Blueprint

  • Set up an Architecture Review Board

  • Introduce reference architectures and patterns

  • Use a collaborative roadmap with delivery teams

Answer Highlights:

  • Align on KPIs across business and tech (e.g., TAT for loans)

  • Reference patterns: modular APIs, workflow engines, document services

  • Embed domain architects into each stream

  • Use tools like LeanIX to show capability-to-system traceability

  • RAID log includes change resistance, time constraints

Case 4: Merger of Two Enterprises with Redundant Tech Stacks

Scenario:You're leading architecture integration for two fintechs post-merger. They use different cloud providers and overlapping platforms (CRM, payments, data lake).

Question:How would you develop a unified architecture strategy?

How to Answer:

  • Conduct Capability Mapping and System Inventory

  • Evaluate duplication vs differentiation

  • Define integration principles (e.g., “best-of-breed”, “consolidate”)

  • Consider hybrid/multi-cloud strategy

  • Lay out phased convergence plan

  • Mitigate team conflict and cultural risk

Answer Highlights:

  • Payments system A has higher scalability → retain it

  • CRM B has better extensibility → standardize on it

  • Common data lake with cross-account access + unified governance

  • Use federated IAM and integration patterns (e.g., event streaming)

  • Culture: run joint architecture workshops to build trust

Case 5: Building a Digital Platform Ecosystem

Scenario:You are asked to design a digital platform that supports third-party integrations (e.g., fintech partners, wealth advisors) on top of core banking services.

Question:How will you architect the platform?

How to Answer:

  • Define Platform Principles: API-first, secure by design, scalable

  • Design Reference Architecture:

    • API Gateway + Auth Layer (OAuth2)

    • Domain APIs (Accounts, KYC, Loans)

    • Event Bus for async flows

    • Developer Portal + Sandbox

  • Build in Monitoring, SLAs, Security

  • Create partner onboarding lifecycle

Answer Highlights:

  • Use Kong or Apigee for API management

  • Implement RBAC per tenant, log all partner actions

  • Adopt micro-frontends for extensibility

  • Sandbox with mock data, clear API documentation (Swagger/OpenAPI)

  • Add monetization engine if usage-based pricing planned


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
How to replan- No outcome after 6 month

⭐ “A transformation program is running for 6 months. Business says it is not delivering the value they expected. What will you do?” “When business says a 6-month transformation isn’t delivering value,

 
 
 
EA Strategy in case of Merger

⭐ EA Strategy in Case of a Merger (M&A) My EA strategy for a merger focuses on four pillars: discover, decide, integrate, and optimize.The goal is business continuity + synergy + tech consolidation. ✅

 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2024 by AeeroTech. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page