top of page

EA Plan -1st Q

  • Writer: Anand Nerurkar
    Anand Nerurkar
  • Feb 24
  • 3 min read

šŸŽÆ How I Would Approach My First 90 Days as Enterprise Architect

šŸ—“ First 30 Days – Onboarding, Assimilation & Leadership Alignment

Objective: Understand, align, and avoid disruption.

In the first month, I focus on three parallel tracks:

  1. Formal onboarding

  2. Business & cultural assimilation

  3. Clear alignment with my reporting leader

1ļøāƒ£ Leadership Alignment (Critical – Week 1 Onwards)

Since my boss hired me, I would prioritize 1:1 alignment early.

I would explicitly ask:

  • What strategic outcomes do you expect from me in 6–12 months?

  • Where do you see architectural gaps today?

  • Is my role transformation-driven, stabilization-driven, or governance-driven?

  • What political sensitivities should I be aware of?

  • Which initiatives do you want me to influence first?

This ensures:

  • I support his/her strategic theme

  • I don’t unintentionally disrupt existing power structures

  • My priorities reflect executive expectations

Before influencing the organization, I must be aligned with the mandate.

That’s realistic EA behavior.

2ļøāƒ£ Formal Onboarding (Weeks 1–2)

Complete:

  • Organization structure understanding

  • IT operating model

  • Security & compliance onboarding

  • Tooling landscape (JIRA, DevOps, cloud, repos)

  • Review standards, principles, reference architectures

  • Governance forums (ARB, CAB, steering committees)

  • Current technology baseline and roadmap

At this stage, I absorb — not judge.

3ļøāƒ£ Business & Strategy Understanding

I would understand:

  • Top 3 business priorities

  • Revenue growth vs cost pressure

  • Regulatory exposure

  • Digital transformation commitments

Architecture must reflect business temperature.

4ļøāƒ£ Cultural & Decision Mapping

  • Who really makes decisions?

  • Engineering-led or business-led?

  • Centralized vs distributed governance?

  • Is architecture influential or bypassed?

If culture is delivery-heavy, I will not introduce heavy governance early.

5ļøāƒ£ Stakeholder Listening Tour (Weeks 2–4)

Meet:

  • CIO / CTO (ongoing alignment)

  • Business heads

  • Engineering leads

  • Cloud / Infra

  • Security

  • Data leadership

  • Senior delivery managers

Ask consistent questions:

  • What are your top priorities?

  • Where does IT struggle?

  • Where does architecture help or slow you down?

  • What worries you in the next 6–12 months?

Goal: Context + trust + perception mapping.

6ļøāƒ£ Review Current Initiatives & Pain Points

Understand:

  • Major in-flight programs

  • Programs under stress

  • Cloud migration status

  • Audit findings

  • Integration complexity

  • Tech debt hotspots

As a new EA, I support existing momentum — not introduce new transformation.

šŸ—“ 30–60 Days – Support & Stabilize

Objective: Move from observer to contributor.

1ļøāƒ£ Embed in 1–2 Critical Programs (As Directed by My Boss)

I would ensure these align with leadership priorities.

Support by:

  • Clarifying architecture direction

  • Reducing rework

  • Aligning cross-team dependencies

  • Introducing lightweight guardrails

Goal: Delivery feels supported.

2ļøāƒ£ Validate Governance & Standards

Instead of rewriting:

  • Are standards practical?

  • Are they followed?

  • Is ARB effective?

Refine selectively. No structural overhaul yet.

3ļøāƒ£ Provide Leadership Feedback Loop

By around Day 60, I would sync back with my boss:

  • Observations

  • Early risks

  • Organizational dynamics

  • 2–3 improvement opportunities

This keeps executive confidence high.

šŸ—“ 60–90 Days – Establish Direction & Credibility

Objective: Gradually move toward structured influence.

1ļøāƒ£ Propose 2–3 Practical Improvements

Examples:

  • API-first integration model

  • Cloud guardrails & FinOps visibility

  • Data ownership clarity

  • Observability baseline

  • Lightweight intake process

Small but structural.

2ļøāƒ£ Align with 12–18 Month Business Strategy

Present:

  • Architectural capability gaps

  • Risk exposure areas

  • Prioritized roadmap aligned to:

    • Revenue

    • Cost

    • Risk

    • Compliance

3ļøāƒ£ Relationship Capital

Influence > AuthorityTrust > FrameworksSupport > Control

Architecture becomes embedded only when delivery trusts it.

ā€œIn my first 90 days, I would focus on onboarding, assimilation, and leadership alignment. Since my reporting leader hired me with specific expectations, I would first clarify the strategic outcomes expected from my role and align my priorities accordingly. I would then understand business goals, cultural dynamics, governance maturity, and ongoing initiatives. Rather than introducing large-scale transformation early, I would embed myself in critical programs to support delivery and build trust. By the end of 90 days, I would present incremental architectural improvements aligned to business and executive priorities. My goal is clarity, credibility, and alignment — not disruption.ā€

Ā 
Ā 
Ā 

Recent Posts

See All
RFP PRE/POST-PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FLOW

šŸ† 1. The 5 Pillars to Win a Large Strategic Deal 1. Understand the Client Better Than They Do šŸ‘‰ Don’t just read RFP — decode it What is their real problem ? What is driving this deal? (compliance, c

Ā 
Ā 
Ā 
DIGITAL LENDING RFP Solution

šŸŽÆ RFP Proposal SOLUTION PRESENTATION – DIGITAL LENDING (WITH COLOR-CODED ARCHITECTURE) 1ļøāƒ£ Opening ā€œThank you for the opportunity. I’ll walk you through our approach to building a next-generation dig

Ā 
Ā 
Ā 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2024 by AeeroTech. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page