Centralized Observability
- Anand Nerurkar
- Oct 19
- 13 min read
How an Enterprise Architect can build true centralized observability across multi-cloud + on-prem, without losing cloud-native advantages.
🧭 1️⃣ The Goal
Create a “single pane of glass” for logs, metrics, traces, and alerts — regardless of where workloads run (Azure, AWS, GCP, or on-prem).
Centralized observability =→ all telemetry collected in a standardized format (OpenTelemetry)→ aggregated in a vendor-neutral observability layer (e.g. Grafana, Elastic, Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk, New Relic)→ accessible through central dashboards, alerting, and correlation.
🧩 2️⃣ Architecture Overview (Conceptually)
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
| Central Observability |
| |
| +----------------+ +----------------+ +----------------+ |
| | Metrics Store | | Logs Store | | Traces Store | |
| | (Prometheus) | | (ELK/Splunk) | | (Jaeger/Tempo) | |
| +----------------+ +----------------+ +----------------+ |
| |
| Unified dashboards (Grafana), alerting, correlation |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
↑ ↑ ↑
| | |
| | |
+---------------+ +----------------+ +----------------+
| Azure Monitor | | AWS CloudWatch | | GCP Monitoring |
+---------------+ +----------------+ +----------------+
↑ ↑ ↑
| | |
| Exporters / OpenTelemetry Collectors |
+-----------------------+----------------------+
↑
|
On-prem Prometheus / ELK
⚙️ 3️⃣ Step-by-Step Implementation
Step 1: Standardize Telemetry Collection
Use OpenTelemetry (OTel) everywhere.
Deploy OTel Collectors on each environment (Kubernetes, VM, or host).
These collectors:
Pull metrics from native sources (Azure Monitor, CloudWatch, GCP Ops Agent, etc.)
Normalize telemetry (convert to OTel format)
Push data to the central collector / aggregator.
📘 Example:
Azure Monitor Metrics → OTel Collector → Prometheus remote write → Central Prometheus
CloudWatch Logs → Firehose → OpenSearch / ELK → Centralized log analytics
Step 2: Choose a Central Observability Platform
There are three broad patterns:
🅐 Option 1 — Self-Managed Central Stack
Deploy a central observability platform in one place (cloud or on-prem):
Metrics → Prometheus + Thanos (for multi-cluster federation)
Logs → ELK / OpenSearch
Traces → Tempo / Jaeger
Dashboards → Grafana
✅ Pros: Full control, cost-optimized❌ Cons: Maintenance heavy, scaling challenge
🅑 Option 2 — Commercial SaaS (Unified APM)
Use cross-cloud SaaS like:
Datadog
New Relic
Dynatrace
Splunk Observability Cloud
Elastic Cloud
✅ Pros: Single pane across Azure + AWS + GCP + On-prem✅ Pros: Out-of-box agents for all clouds❌ Cons: Cost, data sovereignty concerns
🅒 Option 3 — Hybrid Aggregation
Keep cloud-native monitoring local (for latency & cost)
Forward summarized / aggregated telemetry to central SaaS
e.g. send only key metrics, error logs, traces above threshold
✅ Pros: Balance between compliance and central visibility
Step 3: Integration of Cloud-Native Sources
Cloud | Local Observability | How to Export |
Azure | Azure Monitor, Log Analytics | Diagnostic Settings → Event Hub → Logstash / OTel Collector |
AWS | CloudWatch, X-Ray | CloudWatch Metric Streams → Firehose → OpenSearch / OTel Collector |
GCP | Cloud Logging, Monitoring | Ops Agent → Pub/Sub → Fluentd / OTel Collector |
On-prem | Prometheus, ELK | Remote write to central Thanos / Federated Elastic cluster |
All these are funneled through collectors → central pipeline → unified dashboards.
Step 4: Unified Dashboards and Alerts
Use Grafana (or equivalent) as the presentation layer:
Integrate Prometheus (metrics), ELK (logs), Tempo/Jaeger (traces)
Build cross-cloud dashboards
Example: “App latency by region (Azure vs AWS vs GCP)”
Example: “Error rate comparison for Loan Service across environments”
Define unified alert rules (PromQL + Grafana Alerting)
Route alerts to ServiceNow / PagerDuty / Slack
Step 5: Enforce Data Residency & Compliance
Since logs may contain PII or regulated data:
Keep raw logs in-region (in-cloud).
Send aggregated metrics / anonymized logs to the central platform.
Use data masking & tokenization before export (especially from EU/India regions due to GDPR/RBI).
Step 6: Automation & Governance
Integrate into your DevSecOps governance:
Observability standards in every IaC module (Terraform includes logging/metrics setup)
CI/CD pipeline validates:
“No deployment without telemetry configuration”
“All services expose standard OTel endpoints”
Periodic audits: coverage % of monitored services.
🧠 4️⃣ Example — Enterprise-Scale Hybrid Observability (like Deutsche Bank)
Layer | Implementation |
Telemetry Collection | OTel Collectors deployed in each VPC/VNet and on-prem K8s clusters |
Metrics Storage | Thanos (federated Prometheus) in central Azure subscription |
Logs | ELK in Azure; each cloud’s logs exported via FluentBit |
Traces | Tempo collecting from microservices (Spring Boot + OTel SDK) |
Visualization | Grafana dashboards for all environments |
Alerting | Grafana + PagerDuty + ServiceNow |
Governance | Policy: all microservices must implement OTel SDK, logging JSON schema, trace IDs |
Outcome → true centralized visibility, but still cloud-native control in each environment.
✅ 5️⃣ Summary
Challenge | Solution |
Each cloud has its own observability | Standardize via OpenTelemetry |
Need unified dashboards | Grafana / Datadog / Elastic Cloud |
Data residency restrictions | Keep raw logs local, aggregate centrally |
Multi-cloud federation | Prometheus Thanos + Federated ELK |
Consistency enforcement | IaC modules + Policy-as-Code |
Perfect — how to implement centralized observability across multi-cloud and on-prem, step by step.We’ll go layer by layer so you can visualize the flow and the architecture without a diagram.
🧩 1️⃣ The Core Problem
Each environment has its own observability stack:
Azure: Azure Monitor, Log Analytics, Application Insights
AWS: CloudWatch, X-Ray, CloudTrail
GCP: Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Logging
On-Prem: Prometheus, ELK, AppDynamics, Dynatrace
These systems don’t talk to each other natively — so each team gets isolated visibility, which leads to inconsistent monitoring, duplicate alerts, and fragmented root cause analysis.
To solve this, we need a centralized observability plane that can ingest telemetry from all environments, normalize it, and make it viewable and actionable through a unified interface.
⚙️ 2️⃣ The Target State — “Single Pane of Glass” Observability
A centralized observability framework must deliver:
Unified telemetry — logs, metrics, traces in a standard format.
Cross-cloud correlation — same trace ID can be followed from on-prem to Azure to AWS.
Central dashboarding and alerting — one place for SREs, architects, and ops teams to monitor the enterprise ecosystem.
Data residency compliance — sensitive data stays in-region; only metadata or aggregated metrics move centrally.
🧠 3️⃣ Architecture Layers (Text Representation)
Layer 1 – Local Collection per Environment
Each environment (cloud or on-prem) runs local collectors/agents:
Azure: Enable Diagnostic Settings to export telemetry to Event Hub or Log Analytics.
AWS: Use CloudWatch Metric Streams + Firehose or CloudWatch Agent.
GCP: Use Ops Agent or FluentBit to export logs/metrics.
On-Prem: Use Prometheus, Fluentd/FluentBit, and Jaeger/Tempo for distributed tracing.
All these collectors normalize data into OpenTelemetry (OTel) format.
Layer 2 – Telemetry Normalization (OpenTelemetry Collectors)
Each environment sends telemetry (logs, metrics, traces) to a local OpenTelemetry Collector.
The collector converts native formats (CloudWatch, Azure Monitor, GCP Ops Agent outputs) into OpenTelemetry-compatible data.
Collectors can apply filters, data masking, or sampling before forwarding.
This ensures that all telemetry — regardless of cloud — uses a common schema.
Layer 3 – Data Transport
OTel Collectors then push or stream telemetry to a centralized aggregation point using:
gRPC or HTTP for metrics and traces.
FluentBit or Kafka pipeline for logs.
Secure channels via VPN, ExpressRoute, Direct Connect, or Interconnect.
This ensures secure and reliable data flow between cloud regions and the central platform.
Layer 4 – Central Aggregation and Storage
At the enterprise level, you maintain a central observability cluster (can be deployed on any cloud or on-prem), hosting:
Prometheus + Thanos (or VictoriaMetrics) for metrics federation.
Elastic Stack (ELK) or OpenSearch for logs.
Tempo or Jaeger for distributed traces.
These components store, index, and correlate telemetry from all connected environments.
Layer 5 – Visualization and Alerting
Use a central Grafana instance as the unified visualization and alerting layer:
Dashboards show metrics from Prometheus, logs from ELK, traces from Tempo.
You can visualize metrics across environments, e.g.:
“API latency — Azure vs AWS vs On-Prem”
“Error rate — Retail Banking App (multi-region view)”
Define alert rules centrally in Grafana, and route alerts to ServiceNow, PagerDuty, or Slack.
This becomes the single observability control center for all environments.
Layer 6 – Data Governance and Residency
For compliance:
Raw logs stay within the originating environment (e.g., India region for RBI compliance).
Only metadata or aggregated KPIs (counts, error percentages, latency distributions) are exported centrally.
Data masking and encryption are enforced in the collector pipeline.
Access control is federated via corporate SSO (Azure AD / Okta) so only authorized users can view dashboards or query logs.
Layer 7 – Automation and Policy Enforcement
To ensure observability is consistent:
All Terraform or ARM templates for app deployment must include:
OTel SDK integration in app code.
Logging format (JSON + traceID).
Export configuration to OTel Collector.
CI/CD pipelines validate telemetry configuration before promotion.
Periodic policy checks (using OPA / Sentinel) ensure no application is deployed without observability hooks.
This enforces observability governance at build and deploy time.
🏗️ 4️⃣ Step-by-Step Flow (Text Summary)
Application generates telemetry → logs, metrics, and traces.
Local agents (FluentBit, CloudWatch Agent, Ops Agent, Prometheus exporters) collect telemetry.
OpenTelemetry Collectors in each environment standardize and forward telemetry securely.
Central observability cluster ingests all telemetry into Prometheus (metrics), ELK (logs), and Tempo (traces).
Grafana reads from all data sources to present unified dashboards and send alerts.
Data governance policies ensure data masking, encryption, and compliance.
CI/CD automation ensures new workloads automatically onboard into observability.
🧾 5️⃣ Example – Enterprise Scenario (like Deutsche Bank)
Azure: Azure Monitor exports metrics/logs via Event Hub → OTel Collector.
AWS: CloudWatch Streams → Firehose → OTel Collector.
GCP: Cloud Logging → Pub/Sub → FluentBit → OTel Collector.
On-Prem: Prometheus and Fluentd forward data directly to the central Thanos and ELK.
Central Stack: Prometheus + Thanos, ELK, Tempo, Grafana in Azure.
Visualization: Grafana dashboard correlating performance, latency, and availability across all clouds.
Alerting: Grafana Alert Manager → PagerDuty + ServiceNow.
Governance: Policy that every new microservice must emit OTel-compliant telemetry.
Result: one enterprise-wide observability platform that gives unified insight across Azure, AWS, GCP, and on-prem — but still allows each environment to operate its local stack independently.
✅ 6️⃣ Key Takeaways
Goal | Approach |
Eliminate fragmented monitoring | Use OpenTelemetry standard collectors |
Enable cross-cloud correlation | Centralize metrics/logs/traces into one data plane |
Maintain compliance | Keep raw data local, export only aggregates |
Ensure consistent observability | Enforce via IaC, CI/CD, and policy-as-code |
Provide single pane of glass | Grafana + centralized observability stack |
Excellent 👍 — here’s a text-only detailed view of how to enforce centralized observability governance across multi-cloud + on-prem environments.
Think of this as the governance layer that sits above your observability architecture — ensuring consistency, compliance, and reliability across every cloud, business unit, and platform team.
🧭 1️⃣ Objective of Observability Governance
The goal is not just central visibility, but controlled, consistent, and compliant observability across all environments (Azure, AWS, GCP, on-prem).
Governance ensures:
Every system is observable in a consistent way
Metrics, logs, and traces follow enterprise standards
Data privacy, residency, and retention are enforced
Observability cost and performance are managed
Teams adopt observability as a shared responsibility, not ad-hoc monitoring
🏗️ 2️⃣ Governance Operating Model
A. Governance Roles and Responsibilities
Role | Responsibility |
Cloud Center of Excellence (CCoE) | Define observability strategy, standards, and approved tools |
Platform Engineering Team | Build and maintain central observability stack (Grafana, Prometheus, ELK, Tempo) |
Security & Compliance | Approve data residency, masking, encryption, retention policies |
Application / Dev Teams | Implement OTel SDKs and adhere to telemetry standards |
FinOps / Cost Governance | Monitor observability storage, ingestion rates, retention costs |
B. Governance Model Layers
Policy Definition Layer → What to measure and how
Implementation Layer → How telemetry is collected and sent
Compliance & Control Layer → Who validates coverage and data handling
Continuous Improvement Layer → Regular reviews, dashboards, and reports
⚙️ 3️⃣ Standardized Observability Policies (Policy-as-Code)
Governance is implemented as policy-as-code (in Terraform, OPA, or Sentinel) and applied uniformly across all environments.
Policy Category | Example Rule |
Instrumentation Policy | Every microservice must expose /metrics (Prometheus endpoint) and OTel trace ID headers |
Log Policy | Logs must be in JSON with standard fields: timestamp, traceID, spanID, logLevel, serviceName |
Metrics Policy | Metric names must follow <service>_<resource>_<metric> convention |
Trace Policy | Trace context propagation must be W3C standard |
Retention Policy | Metrics retained 30 days, logs 90 days, traces 7 days |
Data Residency | Raw logs cannot be exported from India region; only aggregated metrics allowed |
Access Policy | Grafana dashboards access controlled via Azure AD groups |
Alerting Policy | Every production service must define at least 1 critical and 1 warning alert |
Cost Policy | Alert on storage utilization >80% or ingestion spikes >20% over baseline |
🧠 4️⃣ Lifecycle Integration — Governance at Every Stage
A. Design Phase
Architects define observability requirements in the design document (e.g., KPIs, SLOs, log schema).
Choose approved toolchains (Prometheus, ELK, Tempo, Grafana, OTel SDK).
Select data classification for telemetry (PII, non-PII).
B. Build Phase
Dev teams implement OTel SDK in application code.
Use pre-approved logging libraries and exporters.
Terraform templates automatically configure metrics/logs exporters and OTel Collectors.
C. Deploy Phase
CI/CD pipeline enforces observability compliance:
Check for OTel annotations in manifests.
Validate metrics endpoints exposed.
Reject deployment if telemetry config missing.
D. Run Phase
Continuous compliance checks via OPA or custom scripts.
Automated dashboards show “observability coverage %” by application and cloud.
Alerts for missing telemetry or non-standard log formats.
📊 5️⃣ Centralized Dashboards for Governance
Governance requires its own dashboards, not just for operations, but for policy visibility:
Dashboard Name | Description |
Coverage Dashboard | % of applications with OTel integration across clouds |
Telemetry Quality Dashboard | Schema validation success/failure rates |
Data Residency Dashboard | Data flow compliance across regions |
Retention & Cost Dashboard | Storage usage and cost trends by team |
Alert Hygiene Dashboard | Count of services with no alert or excessive alerts |
Compliance Scorecard | Weighted score per team based on policy adherence |
These dashboards give leadership and audit teams a measurable governance view.
🔒 6️⃣ Data Governance Integration
Observability data often includes sensitive content (PII, account IDs, tokens), so governance enforces:
Control | Implementation |
Data Masking | OTel Collector processors mask regex-defined PII (email, PAN, phone) |
Encryption in Transit | TLS between collectors and central stack |
Encryption at Rest | ELK, Prometheus, Tempo configured with encrypted disks |
Regional Isolation | Logs stay local, aggregated metrics allowed centrally |
Audit Trails | Access to logs and dashboards audited via SSO provider |
These ensure RBI, GDPR, and ISO27001 compliance across all observability data.
🧩 7️⃣ Tooling Integration for Central Governance
Function | Tool / Platform |
Policy Enforcement | OPA (Open Policy Agent), Terraform Sentinel |
Automation | GitOps (ArgoCD/Flux) for config drift detection |
Security & Compliance | Prisma Cloud, Defender for Cloud for posture scanning |
Cost Management | CloudHealth / Azure Cost Mgmt for storage and ingestion |
Incident Mgmt Integration | Grafana Alerts → ServiceNow / PagerDuty |
Audit | ServiceNow CMDB and Governance module track coverage |
🏛️ 8️⃣ Governance Operating Rhythm (Cadence)
Frequency | Activity | Stakeholders |
Weekly | Review of observability compliance metrics | Platform + DevOps Teams |
Monthly | Architecture & Observability Governance Guild (cross-cloud review) | CCoE, Security, App Leads |
Quarterly | Executive summary of observability maturity and gaps | CTO, CIO, Compliance |
Ad-hoc | Root cause analysis and governance updates post-incident | SRE + CCoE |
🧭 9️⃣ Example — How It Works in Practice
Scenario: Loan Processing microservices deployed across Azure and on-prem.
Each service uses the standard OTel SDK to emit metrics and traces.
Logs in JSON format with traceID.
Local OTel Collectors forward metrics/logs to Azure Monitor and the central Thanos/ELK cluster.
Governance policy checks verify:
OTel annotations present in manifest.
Logs use approved schema.
Data not leaving India region.
Grafana dashboard shows this app as “Compliant: 100%” in the governance view.
If non-compliant, CI/CD blocks release and notifies the team.
This creates continuous compliance — governance is enforced automatically.
✅ 10️⃣ Summary — Enterprise Observability Governance Framework
Layer | Governance Focus | Implementation |
Policy Definition | Standards for telemetry, schema, retention, security | Defined by CCoE |
Instrumentation Governance | OTel SDK mandatory, standard log schema | Enforced via IaC templates |
Data Governance | Residency, masking, encryption | Managed by Security & Compliance |
Operational Governance | Dashboards, alert hygiene, SLOs | Central Grafana + SRE process |
Audit & Reporting | Compliance scorecards, cost tracking | Monthly governance reports |
Continuous Improvement | Update standards, optimize retention | Quarterly CCoE review |
In short:
Centralized observability governance = standards + automation + enforcement + continuous measurement.
It ensures that all environments (multi-cloud + on-prem) remain observable, compliant, and cost-efficient — under one unified enterprise control plane.
Perfect 👍 — let’s go deep step-by-step on how to design and implement centralized observability across multi-cloud (Azure, AWS, GCP) and on-prem environments.
🎯 Objective
Enable a single pane of glass for logs, metrics, and traces across heterogeneous environments, ensuring unified governance, visibility, and compliance.
🧩 1. Problem Context
In a multi-cloud + on-prem setup:
Each cloud has its own observability stack:
Azure → Azure Monitor, Application Insights, Log Analytics
AWS → CloudWatch, X-Ray
GCP → Cloud Operations Suite (Stackdriver)
On-Prem → Prometheus, Grafana, ELK
Each works well within its own boundary, but enterprises need:
Cross-cloud visibility
Unified dashboards
Central alerting & SLOs
Governed access & data retention
🧭 2. Step-by-Step Approach
Step 1️⃣: Define Observability Domains
Break it down into three pillars:
Logs (App, System, Audit)
Metrics (Performance, Infra, SLIs)
Traces (Distributed transaction tracing)
Each domain will have a collector, transport, and central sink.
Step 2️⃣: Standardize on OpenTelemetry (OTel)
Use OpenTelemetry (OTel) as a common instrumentation and data pipeline layer across all environments.
Deploy OTel agents or collectors on all workloads (cloud & on-prem).
Configure them to export data to a centralized backend (instead of each cloud-native monitor).
Benefit:
Unified data model
Vendor-neutral
Cloud-agnostic observability
Example:
[Application] -> [OTel Collector] -> [Central Observability Platform]
Step 3️⃣: Use a Central Aggregation Platform
Choose one enterprise-grade aggregator as your single source of truth for observability:
Option 1: Grafana Cloud / Grafana Enterprise Stack
Centralized dashboards (Grafana)
Logs (Loki)
Metrics (Prometheus)
Traces (Tempo)
Works across multi-cloud and on-prem seamlessly
Option 2: ELK / OpenSearch Stack
Logstash or FluentBit as collectors
Elasticsearch / OpenSearch as data store
Kibana / OpenSearch Dashboards for visualization
Option 3: Commercial tools
Datadog / New Relic / Dynatrace / Splunk Observability Cloud
Direct multi-cloud integration
SaaS-based, already centralized
Step 4️⃣: Implement Unified Data Flow
For each environment:
Environment | Local Collector | Data Transport | Central Sink |
Azure | OTel Collector → Event Hub | Kafka / HTTP | Grafana / ELK |
AWS | OTel Collector → Kinesis | Kafka / HTTP | Grafana / ELK |
GCP | OTel Collector → Pub/Sub | Kafka / HTTP | Grafana / ELK |
On-Prem | Prometheus / FluentBit | Kafka / HTTP | Grafana / ELK |
Kafka (or Confluent Cloud) acts as a message bus between clouds and the central platform.
Step 5️⃣: Centralized Governance & Access Control
Governance Layers:
Data Classification: Tag logs and traces with source, tenant, and sensitivity.
Access Control:
Integrate Grafana / Kibana with Azure AD / Okta / LDAP.
RBAC by environment, team, and data type.
Retention Policy: Define log retention per compliance (e.g., SEBI/RBI for banking: 7 years for audit logs).
Masking & PII Governance: Use FluentBit or OTel processors to mask sensitive data at collection time.
Step 6️⃣: Unified Alerting & SLOs
Define global SLOs (e.g., API Latency < 300ms, Error Rate < 1%)
Configure alerts centrally (Grafana Alerting / PagerDuty / ServiceNow)
Alerts route to respective CloudOps/DevOps teams automatically
Step 7️⃣: Enable FinOps & Operational Insights
Combine observability data + cost data from each cloud.
Build unified FinOps dashboards in Grafana or Power BI.
Helps measure:
Cloud spend vs performance
Environment utilization
SLA adherence
Step 8️⃣: Hybrid Deployment Architecture (Example)
┌────────────────────────┐
│ Central Observability │
│ (Grafana + Loki + ELK) │
└──────────┬─────────────┘
│
┌───────────────┼────────────────┐
│ │ │
[Azure OTel] [AWS OTel] [GCP OTel]
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
Event Hub Kinesis Stream Pub/Sub
│ │ │
└──────────────► Kafka ◄─────────┘
│
▼
Central Platform
🧱 3. Governance Framework for Observability
Governance Area | Description | Enforcement |
Instrumentation Standards | Define consistent OTel SDK usage | Architecture Guilds |
Tagging Policy | Every log/metric tagged with app, env, region | OTel processors |
Data Retention | Logs: 7 yrs, Metrics: 90 days | Index lifecycle policy |
Access Control | RBAC via Azure AD SSO | Grafana/Kibana config |
Data Residency | Logs stay in-country for compliance | Region-specific storage |
Change Management | Observability configs in Git | GitOps pipeline |
✅ 4. Outcome
Unified visibility across Azure, AWS, GCP, and On-prem
Centralized alerting, governance, and auditability
Cloud-agnostic observability using OpenTelemetry + Grafana / ELK
Supports compliance (RBI, SEBI, GDPR, ISO 27001)
.png)

Comments