Central Authentication & Authorizationin Multi Cloud
- Anand Nerurkar
- 28 minutes ago
- 4 min read
Excellent — this is one of the most common and deep-dive questions Enterprise Architects get in interviews 👇
❓“In a multi-cloud hybrid environment, how do you manage authentication and authorization consistently across Azure, AWS, and on-prem?”
Let’s break it down step-by-step, like a real-world Enterprise Architect explaining it to a CTO panel.
🧩 Step 1: Understand the Core Challenge
In multi-cloud setups, you have:
Workloads across Azure (AKS, APIM), AWS (EKS, API Gateway), and On-Prem (VMware, Finacle, Oracle)
Users, partners, and apps that need to authenticate once and access services across these clouds
Different cloud-native IAM systems (Azure AD, AWS IAM, GCP IAM), each with its own identity model
So the challenge:👉 How to create a single, consistent identity and access model across all clouds + on-premwithout duplicating identity or having fragmented access control.
🧱 Step 2: Adopt a Centralized Identity Provider (IdP)
In production, banks and large enterprises NEVER depend on cloud-native IAM alone.
They use a central enterprise-grade Identity Provider that acts as the single source of truth for identity and access.
Identity Provider | Typical Enterprise Usage |
Azure AD / Entra ID | Most common in BFSI |
Ping Identity / PingFederate | Often used in banks for hybrid setups |
Okta / ForgeRock / IBM Security Verify | Large global organizations |
On-Prem AD + Federation | Legacy coexistence |
So, all clouds (Azure, AWS, GCP) trust this single IdP via federation.
🛠️ Step 3: Authentication (AuthN) Flow
Let’s see how a real authentication flow happens step by step in production:
🔹 Scenario:
Customer logs into api.deuebank.com/lending/applyLending is hosted on Azure, CRM on AWS, and core systems on on-prem.
🔸 Step-by-step Authentication:
User Access Request
User tries to access Lending Portal (Azure Front Door URL).
Redirection to Central IdP
App redirects to Azure AD (or PingFederate) for authentication.
This IdP is federated with AWS IAM and On-Prem AD.
Credential Validation
User enters credentials (could be username/password, certificate, or SSO).
IdP validates it against enterprise directory (Active Directory / LDAP).
Token Issuance
On successful authentication, IdP issues:
OIDC ID Token (for user identity)
OAuth2 Access Token (for API access)
JWT format, signed with the IdP’s private key.
Token Validation by APIs
API Gateways (Azure APIM, AWS API Gateway, On-Prem Kong) validate the same JWT using the IdP’s public key (JWKS endpoint).
No matter which cloud the API is in, it uses the same token validation logic.
✅ Result: Single Sign-On (SSO) across Azure, AWS, and On-Prem.
🧰 Step 4: Authorization (AuthZ) Flow
Once authenticated, authorization defines what you can do.
Authorization happens at 3 layers:
Layer | Responsibility | Tools / Mechanism |
1. Gateway-level | Enforce API scopes, rate limits | Azure APIM policies / Apigee / Kong |
2. Service-level | Fine-grained access (e.g., view loan, approve loan) | Role-based / Attribute-based access control (RBAC/ABAC) |
3. Data-level | Row-level / column masking | Database-level RBAC or policies |
🔸 Step-by-Step Authorization Example:
Continuing our Digital Lending use case 👇
API Gateway (Azure APIM) validates the OAuth2 token.
Token claims:
{ "sub": "anand.nirurkar", "roles": ["LoanOfficer", "Underwriter"], "scope": "loan.read loan.approve" }
Gateway Enforces Scopes
Only requests with scope loan.approve can call the /approve endpoint.
Backend Microservice
Uses the same JWT claims (via Spring Security or OAuth2 Resource Server)
Authorizes based on roles/attributes in the token.
Cross-cloud Authorization
AWS microservices (CRM) and On-Prem services (CBS Adapter) use the same token introspection endpoint from the central IdP.
Therefore, no re-login is needed.
✅ Result: Unified role-based access across all clouds and systems.
🔐 Step 5: Token Federation & Trust Setup
Cloud | Trust Mechanism | Description |
Azure Cloud | Azure AD Enterprise App Federation | Trusts central IdP via SAML / OIDC |
AWS Cloud | AWS Cognito Federation / IAM OIDC Provider | Trusts same IdP for token validation |
On-Prem | PingFederate / ADFS / Keycloak | Trusts same IdP via SAML |
💡 So, the same JWT or SAML assertion is valid across all environments.
🧩 Step 6: Real Production Security Controls
Concern | Control | Implementation |
MFA (Multi-Factor Auth) | Required for admin & sensitive roles | Azure AD / Ping MFA |
Token Lifetime | Short-lived (15–30 min) | Rotated via refresh tokens |
Zero Trust Access | Validate every request | No implicit trust between networks |
Service-to-Service Auth | mTLS + Service Identity (SPIFFE / SPIRE) | Inside mesh (Istio, Dapr) |
Secrets Management | Centralized vault | HashiCorp Vault / Azure Key Vault |
Audit & Logging | SIEM Integration | Splunk / Azure Sentinel |
🧠 Step 7: How Enterprises Operate This in Practice
Azure AD (or PingFederate) acts as central identity hub.
All APIs in Azure, AWS, and on-prem are registered with the same IdP.
Global API Gateway (Apigee / Kong) uses OAuth2 + OpenID Connect tokens.
Service meshes (Istio / Dapr) inside clusters perform mTLS for internal authentication.
Auditing, access logs, and token traces are centralized in Splunk or Sentinel.
✅ Summary
“In our multi-cloud architecture, we use a central identity provider — Azure AD integrated with PingFederate — as the single source of truth for authentication and authorization.All workloads across Azure, AWS, and on-prem trust this IdP using OIDC and SAML federation.This ensures that a user or service authenticated once can securely access resources across any environment using a JWT-based OAuth2 token.Authorization is enforced at multiple layers — API Gateway, microservices, and data — using scopes, roles, and attributes embedded in the token. Service-to-service authentication uses mTLS and SPIFFE-based identities within service meshes like Istio. This gives us centralized identity management, consistent access control, and full auditability across multi-cloud and hybrid systems — meeting RBI and GDPR compliance.”
Comments